DIGITAL AMERICA

Tag: planned Obsolescence


4chan anonymous copyright counterculture culture democracy digital digital america digital culture digital divide Education Facebook Google Government hackers hacking Information Please Innovation internet IPhone Julian Assange Mark Poster Mexico Netizen new media NSA Obama Occupy Online Activism politics Privacy snowden social awareness social media SOPA Stuxnet Tec de Monterrey technology Ted Talks Turkle Twitter USA WikiLeaks wired youtube

AAUGH

// Posted by on 06/11/2015 (6:48 PM)

After reading Made To Break and watching the videos my head is spinning. I don’t know if I view planned obsolescence as a sinister plot by manufactures to swindle consumers or if it is essentially the work of competitive technological… Read more

+
4

After reading Made To Break and watching the videos my head is spinning. I don’t know if I view planned obsolescence as a sinister plot by manufactures to swindle consumers or if it is essentially the work of competitive technological forces that lead to the improvement of our goods and services. Although there are industries that essentially function on planned obsolescence, for example the garment industry, last year’s fashions are replaced by this year’s new fashions. The deliberate manufacture of products designed to fail or producing effectively toxic and hazardous products, with a limited life span, without the management of their product’s lifecycle, is appalling.

These videos and reading make it so apparent that to be a responsible consumer today you need to know where your e-waste is going. It is more than just making the choice to do the right thing and bring your e-waste to free collection events. It is also about knowing where it goes from there. All electronics eventually end up at a recycling company at some point. Bringing e-waste to charitable programs and take-back programs are not responsible if the e-waste is only another path to unscrupulous recyclers.

I guess that it just all comes down to money, the manufacturers use planned obsolescence to essentially swindle consumers into repetitive buying and the impoverished individuals that are breaking down the e-waste are doing so for the money. But like Mike said in the video, they are exchanging their life of poverty for a lung full of poison. It is horrendous that these practices are happening and that more isn’t being done to stop it.

The reading and videos leave me feeling a bit confused as to what to do about the massive e-waste problem. I don’t know if the manufacturers that are developing electrical products need to be held accountable for the product’s lifecycle or if the products need to come with warning labels. It is evident that something needs to be done and it needs to be done quickly as it is evident that societies reliance on personal technology such as cell phones, laptops, computers, and printers is increasing. The consumption is reckless and is not sustainable. It needs to be done responsibly or we all loose.


Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,
+

Opulent, Oblique, and Obsolete

// Posted by on 06/10/2015 (9:39 PM)

http://storyofstuff.org/movies/story-of-electronics/

Hi my name is David and I’m a “trailblazing consumer.”

Really though, I’m a combination of “trailblazing consumer,” “fashion fanatic,” and sometimes I’m just a “fickle consumer.” The bottom line is I’m just as… Read more

+
2

http://storyofstuff.org/movies/story-of-electronics/

Hi my name is David and I’m a “trailblazing consumer.”

Really though, I’m a combination of “trailblazing consumer,” “fashion fanatic,” and sometimes I’m just a “fickle consumer.” The bottom line is I’m just as guilty of this outrageous management of e-waste as the rest of the developed world is.

I strongly encourage you to watch the video above as well as this one, http://storyofstuff.org/movies/story-of-stuff/.

I love Annie Leonard. I was very excited to find out that she was going to be the keynote speaker at a conference I went to back in October. She’s not doing too much work with The Story of Stuff Project these days, but she is currently the Executive Director of Greenpeace.

I’ve always known that e-waste was bad, but I don’t think I knew how bad it had escalated. I just thought we had separate recycling because it was bad for heavy metals to wind up in the landfill and that perhaps components could be reused. I didn’t once think, and I keep up with environmental issues fairly regularly, that these items were being shipped overseas for the poorest of some other country to be left with the remnants of the developed world’s arrogance and wastefulness.

These videos depicted the results of the developed world’s constant desire for the newest and the best. I have to wonder why more information about this isn’t widely circulated, but then I think about it for a second and I quickly affirm that the reason is money. If the obsolescence of computer, TVs, cell phones, and so on wasn’t planned, what reason would consumers, we’ll say in the United States, have to buy a new fill in the blank. Because cell phone companies offer one and two year contract, the average person takes that to mean that in one to two years they will need to get a new cell phone, and they will. Odds are the cellphone manufacturers, Apple, Motorola, etc. will have new models out by the end of that contract period too. Why would you not want to buy the latest and greatest?

So who’s at fault for these atrocities? I know that’s a strong word, but odds are the manufacturers, marketing companies, and even the consumers are aware of some aspect of the waste generated by the disposal and constant desire to have the latest and greatest electronic gadget. Slade states that “our actions as consumers of electronic goods clearly has a ripple effect around the world.

The United States has an opportunity to be a leader here. We need to be a leader in the proper dismantling of e-waste and the proper recycling of reusable parts and disposal of those that aren’t able to be used again. Further, we need to come up with better practices about how we manage what cannot be used again. Since we, as an intelligent people, are aware that the metals and other materials that are used to make our electronics are toxic – we need to find sustainable alternatives that will ultimately mitigate the environmental impact when they make their way to into the waste stream. This is an issue we need to handle domestically – not pawn off on the poor in developing nations. Perhaps if we left this issue at home, and we had to see it every day, we, as consumers, wouldn’t be as quick to jump and buy the latest and greatest. We vote with our wallets, and I know that if I find out a company is taking steps to better manage their electronic waste, and they are finding ways to incorporate fewer and less toxic materials into their products that I would quickly opt to support them with my purchase.

What’s more important? Our environmental future or making a few bucks on selling a few more cell phones?


Categories: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , ,
+